Construction vs. Manufacturing
Employment Structure and Growth by County
Michigan, 2001-2022
Employment by County
Percent of Total Employment, 2022
Select a Year/Indicator:Percent of Total
EmploymentLocation
QuotientsPercent of Sector Total
Statewide
Employment by County
View Distribution Totals as:Actual Percent
   
 
Construction vs. Manufacturing
Michigan Employment Distribution by County:
Percent of Total Employment, 2022
More
than
9%
9%
to
8%
8%
to
7%
7%
to
6%
6%
to
5%
5%
to
4%
4%
to
3%
3%
or
Below
Total
Construction
9
4
12
19
16
15
5
3
83
Manufacturing
51
6
4
6
5
2
6
3
83
 
   
Select an alternate year:
   
 
Construction vs. Manufacturing
Employment Structure by County:
Michigan, 2022
 
Construction
 
Manufacturing
County
 
Jobs
Percent
of Total
Jobs
1Location
Quotient
Percent
of State
Sector
Total
 
Jobs
Percent
of Total
Jobs
1Location
Quotient
Percent
of State
Sector
Total
Alcona
 
211
6.0
1.1
0.1
 
238
6.7
1.1
0.0
Alger
 
212
5.7
1.0
0.1
 
456
12.3
1.9
0.1
Allegan
 
4,772
8.2
1.5
1.6
 
14,010
24.1
3.8
2.2
Alpena
 
806
5.0
0.9
0.3
 
2,049
12.7
2.0
0.3
Antrim
 
1,077
11.3
2.0
0.4
 
824
8.6
1.4
0.1
Arenac
 
289
4.8
0.9
0.1
 
907
15.0
2.4
0.1
Baraga
 
146
4.1
0.7
0.0
 
598
16.7
2.6
0.1
Barry
 
1,537
7.0
1.3
0.5
 
3,774
17.3
2.7
0.6
Bay
 
2,434
5.1
0.9
0.8
 
4,856
10.2
1.6
0.8
Benzie
 
901
10.8
1.9
0.3
 
434
5.2
0.8
0.1
Berrien
 
3,921
4.7
0.8
1.3
 
13,203
15.7
2.5
2.1
Branch
 
965
4.7
0.8
0.3
 
3,215
15.7
2.5
0.5
Calhoun
 
2,983
4.3
0.8
1.0
 
10,712
15.6
2.4
1.7
Cass
 
1,032
6.4
1.2
0.3
 
2,300
14.3
2.2
0.4
Charlevoix
 
1,338
8.1
1.5
0.5
 
2,862
17.4
2.7
0.5
Cheboygan
 
1,076
10.2
1.8
0.4
 
297
2.8
0.4
0.0
Chippewa
 
805
4.8
0.9
0.3
 
658
3.9
0.6
0.1
Clare
 
858
7.8
1.4
0.3
 
990
9.0
1.4
0.2
Clinton
 
2,814
9.4
1.7
0.9
 
1,726
5.8
0.9
0.3
Crawford
 
265
4.7
0.8
0.1
 
730
13.0
2.0
0.1
Delta
 
811
4.5
0.8
0.3
 
2,154
11.8
1.9
0.3
Dickinson
 
2,115
12.4
2.2
0.7
 
3,044
17.8
2.8
0.5
Eaton
 
2,764
4.7
0.8
0.9
 
7,114
12.2
1.9
1.1
Emmet
 
2,375
9.1
1.6
0.8
 
1,710
6.6
1.0
0.3
Genesee
 
10,794
5.7
1.0
3.6
 
14,384
7.6
1.2
2.3
Gladwin
 
876
11.2
2.0
0.3
 
702
9.0
1.4
0.1
Gogebic
 
347
5.0
0.9
0.1
 
780
11.2
1.8
0.1
Grand Traverse
 
4,909
6.6
1.2
1.7
 
5,310
7.2
1.1
0.8
Gratiot
 
649
3.6
0.7
0.2
 
2,036
11.4
1.8
0.3
Hillsdale
 
950
5.0
0.9
0.3
 
3,737
19.8
3.1
0.6
Houghton
 
1,053
6.1
1.1
0.4
 
1,158
6.7
1.1
0.2
Huron
 
993
5.9
1.1
0.3
 
1,883
11.2
1.8
0.3
Ingham
 
7,572
3.9
0.7
2.6
 
11,988
6.2
1.0
1.9
Ionia
 
1,623
6.3
1.1
0.5
 
4,067
15.9
2.5
0.6
Iosco
 
709
6.3
1.1
0.2
 
1,205
10.6
1.7
0.2
Iron
 
366
7.5
1.3
0.1
 
295
6.0
1.0
0.0
Isabella
 
2,060
5.5
1.0
0.7
 
3,051
8.1
1.3
0.5
Jackson
 
3,881
5.0
0.9
1.3
 
9,891
12.8
2.0
1.6
Kalamazoo
 
8,775
5.4
1.0
3.0
 
21,975
13.5
2.1
3.5
Kalkaska
 
949
13.5
2.4
0.3
 
355
5.1
0.8
0.1
Kent
 
26,140
4.9
0.9
8.8
 
66,946
12.6
2.0
10.6
Keweenaw
 
44
5.8
1.0
0.0
 
24
3.2
0.5
0.0
Lake
 
238
7.2
1.3
0.1
 
100
3.0
0.5
0.0
Lapeer
 
3,007
8.6
1.5
1.0
 
4,821
13.8
2.2
0.8
Leelanau
 
1,122
8.4
1.5
0.4
 
683
5.1
0.8
0.1
Lenawee
 
2,177
5.6
1.0
0.7
 
4,751
12.2
1.9
0.7
Livingston
 
7,295
7.4
1.3
2.5
 
10,882
11.0
1.7
1.7
Luce
 
S
S
U
S
 
83
3.5
0.6
0.0
Mackinac
 
444
6.8
1.2
0.1
 
163
2.5
0.4
0.0
Macomb
 
29,295
6.1
1.1
9.9
 
68,187
14.2
2.2
10.8
Manistee
 
710
6.8
1.2
0.2
 
996
9.5
1.5
0.2
Marquette
 
1,907
5.5
1.0
0.6
 
1,300
3.8
0.6
0.2
Mason
 
1,001
6.7
1.2
0.3
 
2,193
14.8
2.3
0.3
Mecosta
 
737
3.8
0.7
0.2
 
1,566
8.1
1.3
0.2
Menominee
 
403
3.9
0.7
0.1
 
2,367
22.9
3.6
0.4
Midland
 
3,169
6.4
1.2
1.1
 
4,851
9.8
1.5
0.8
Missaukee
 
428
6.9
1.2
0.1
 
782
12.6
2.0
0.1
Monroe
 
3,688
6.3
1.1
1.2
 
5,575
9.5
1.5
0.9
Montcalm
 
1,720
7.1
1.3
0.6
 
3,101
12.9
2.0
0.5
Montmorency
 
S
S
U
S
 
551
16.4
2.6
0.1
Muskegon
 
4,269
5.2
0.9
1.4
 
14,212
17.2
2.7
2.2
Newaygo
 
1,249
6.6
1.2
0.4
 
2,449
12.9
2.0
0.4
Oakland
 
43,872
4.2
0.8
14.8
 
73,964
7.1
1.1
11.7
Oceana
 
706
6.7
1.2
0.2
 
1,646
15.7
2.5
0.3
Ogemaw
 
596
6.6
1.2
0.2
 
450
5.0
0.8
0.1
Ontonagon
 
112
5.2
0.9
0.0
 
42
1.9
0.3
0.0
Osceola
 
1,402
12.6
2.3
0.5
 
1,850
16.7
2.6
0.3
Oscoda
 
202
7.2
1.3
0.1
 
258
9.2
1.4
0.0
Otsego
 
1,173
7.8
1.4
0.4
 
1,128
7.5
1.2
0.2
Ottawa
 
10,576
5.9
1.1
3.6
 
43,793
24.3
3.8
6.9
Presque Isle
 
338
7.1
1.3
0.1
 
183
3.8
0.6
0.0
Roscommon
 
657
7.6
1.4
0.2
 
414
4.8
0.8
0.1
Saginaw
 
4,732
4.5
0.8
1.6
 
11,775
11.1
1.7
1.9
St. Clair
 
5,030
7.6
1.4
1.7
 
8,288
12.5
2.0
1.3
St. Joseph
 
1,368
4.8
0.9
0.5
 
7,878
27.7
4.3
1.2
Sanilac
 
1,173
6.7
1.2
0.4
 
2,865
16.4
2.6
0.5
Schoolcraft
 
211
6.1
1.1
0.1
 
213
6.1
1.0
0.0
Shiawassee
 
1,683
6.7
1.2
0.6
 
2,194
8.7
1.4
0.3
Tuscola
 
1,455
7.6
1.4
0.5
 
1,583
8.3
1.3
0.2
Van Buren
 
1,956
6.0
1.1
0.7
 
3,322
10.3
1.6
0.5
Washtenaw
 
7,754
2.8
0.5
2.6
 
13,352
4.8
0.8
2.1
Wayne
 
38,157
3.8
0.7
12.9
 
97,067
9.7
1.5
15.3
Wexford
 
783
4.2
0.7
0.3
 
3,500
18.7
2.9
0.6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan
 
296,316
5.1
0.9
100.0
 
634,026
10.8
1.7
100.0
Metropolitan
 
238,980
4.8
0.9
80.7
 
531,224
10.6
1.7
83.8
Nonmetropolitan
 
57,336
6.7
1.2
19.3
 
102,802
11.9
1.9
16.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
11,867,800
5.6
1.0
 
13,523,700
6.4
1.0
Metropolitan U.S.
 
10,399,601
5.5
1.0
 
10,971,947
5.8
0.9
Nonmetropolitan U.S.
 
1,468,199
6.1
1.1
 
2,551,753
10.5
1.7
1Ratio of the share of earninngs in a given industry locally to the corresponding industry share nationwide.
SSuppressed to avoid disclosure of confidential information.
U(Undefined) Insufficient Data Available.
Source: Calculations by the Michigan Regional Economic Analysis Project (MI-REAP)
with data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_510400_510500_SA
 
   
Select an alternate year:
   
 
Construction vs. Manufacturing
Employment Structure by Region:
Michigan, 2022
 
Construction
 
Manufacturing
Metropolitan Statistical Areas
 
Jobs
Percent
of Total
Jobs
1Location
Quotient
Percent
of State
Sector
Total
 
Jobs
Percent
of Total
Jobs
1Location
Quotient
Percent
of State
Sector
Total
Ann Arbor
 
7,754
2.8
0.5
2.6
 
13,352
4.8
0.8
2.1
Battle Creek
 
2,983
4.3
0.8
1.0
 
10,712
15.6
2.4
1.7
Bay City
 
2,434
5.1
0.9
0.8
 
4,856
10.2
1.6
0.8
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn
 
126,656
4.7
0.8
42.7
 
263,209
9.7
1.5
41.5
Flint
 
10,794
5.7
1.0
3.6
 
14,384
7.6
1.2
2.3
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
 
40,059
5.3
0.9
13.5
 
117,907
15.5
2.4
18.6
Jackson
 
3,881
5.0
0.9
1.3
 
9,891
12.8
2.0
1.6
Kalamazoo-Portage
 
8,775
5.4
1.0
3.0
 
21,975
13.5
2.1
3.5
Lansing-East Lansing
 
14,833
4.9
0.9
5.0
 
23,022
7.5
1.2
3.6
Midland
 
3,169
6.4
1.2
1.1
 
4,851
9.8
1.5
0.8
Monroe
 
3,688
6.3
1.1
1.2
 
5,575
9.5
1.5
0.9
Muskegon-Norton Shores
 
4,269
5.2
0.9
1.4
 
14,212
17.2
2.7
2.2
Niles
 
3,921
4.7
0.8
1.3
 
13,203
15.7
2.5
2.1
Saginaw
 
4,732
4.5
0.8
1.6
 
11,775
11.1
1.7
1.9
South Bend-Mishawaka
 
8,802
5.0
0.9
3.0
 
16,338
9.2
1.4
2.6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan
 
296,316
5.1
0.9
100.0
 
634,026
10.8
1.7
100.0
Metropolitan
 
238,980
4.8
0.9
80.7
 
531,224
10.6
1.7
83.8
Nonmetropolitan
 
57,336
6.7
1.2
19.3
 
102,802
11.9
1.9
16.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
11,867,800
5.6
1.0
 
13,523,700
6.4
1.0
Metropolitan U.S.
 
10,399,601
5.5
1.0
 
10,971,947
5.8
0.9
Nonmetropolitan U.S.
 
1,468,199
6.1
1.1
 
2,551,753
10.5
1.7
1Ratio of the share of earninngs in a given industry locally to the corresponding industry share nationwide.
Source: Calculations by the Michigan Regional Economic Analysis Project (MI-REAP)
with data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_510400_510500_SB
 
   
Employment Growth by County
Growth Rates, 2022
Select a Year/Indicator:Growth RatesComponent Contributions
Employment Growth by County
View Distribution Totals as:Actual Percent
   
 
Construction vs. Manufacturing
Michigan Employment Growth Distribution by County:
Growth Rates, 2022
More
than
3%
3%
to
2%
2%
to
1%
1%
to
0%
0%
to
-1%
-1%
to
-2%
-2%
to
-3%
-3%
or
Below
Total
Construction
54
11
3
3
0
2
1
9
83
Manufacturing
47
9
7
4
3
2
4
7
83
 
   
Select an alternate year:
   
 
Construction vs. Manufacturing
Employment Growth by County:
Michigan, 2022
 
Construction
 
Manufacturing
County
 
Growth
Rate
CC1
2Local -
National
Growth
3Local -
State
Growth
 
Growth
Rate
CC1
2Local -
National
Growth
3Local -
State
Growth
Alcona
 
3.4
0.2
-0.7
-0.8
 
3.9
0.3
0.3
0.2
Alger
 
6.0
0.3
1.9
1.8
 
-2.8
-0.4
-6.4
-6.5
Allegan
 
4.3
0.4
0.2
0.1
 
1.6
0.4
-2.1
-2.2
Alpena
 
3.6
0.2
-0.5
-0.6
 
8.8
1.1
5.1
5.0
Antrim
 
3.7
0.4
-0.5
-0.6
 
-2.3
-0.2
-5.9
-6.0
Arenac
 
7.0
0.3
2.9
2.8
 
8.6
1.2
5.0
4.9
Baraga
 
2.1
0.1
-2.1
-2.1
 
9.5
1.5
5.9
5.8
Barry
 
4.2
0.3
0.1
0.0
 
-0.2
0.0
-3.8
-3.9
Bay
 
6.6
0.3
2.5
2.4
 
3.0
0.3
-0.6
-0.7
Benzie
 
6.3
0.7
2.1
2.0
 
3.8
0.2
0.2
0.1
Berrien
 
5.4
0.2
1.2
1.1
 
6.9
1.1
3.2
3.1
Branch
 
1.4
0.1
-2.8
-2.9
 
5.0
0.8
1.4
1.2
Calhoun
 
2.6
0.1
-1.5
-1.6
 
1.8
0.3
-1.9
-2.0
Cass
 
4.8
0.3
0.6
0.5
 
-4.2
-0.6
-7.8
-7.9
Charlevoix
 
-2.8
-0.3
-7.0
-7.1
 
10.8
1.8
7.1
7.0
Cheboygan
 
-3.1
-0.3
-7.2
-7.3
 
3.5
0.1
-0.1
-0.3
Chippewa
 
15.0
0.6
10.9
10.8
 
3.6
0.1
0.0
-0.1
Clare
 
2.8
0.2
-1.4
-1.5
 
2.5
0.2
-1.1
-1.3
Clinton
 
5.9
0.6
1.7
1.6
 
5.4
0.3
1.7
1.6
Crawford
 
4.7
0.2
0.6
0.5
 
2.0
0.3
-1.7
-1.8
Delta
 
-19.2
-1.1
-23.4
-23.4
 
0.3
0.0
-3.3
-3.5
Dickinson
 
-8.8
-1.2
-12.9
-13.0
 
0.8
0.1
-2.9
-3.0
Eaton
 
0.5
0.0
-3.6
-3.7
 
10.0
1.1
6.3
6.2
Emmet
 
3.8
0.3
-0.4
-0.5
 
6.6
0.4
3.0
2.8
Genesee
 
7.5
0.4
3.3
3.2
 
2.8
0.2
-0.8
-0.9
Gladwin
 
7.1
0.8
2.9
2.9
 
9.0
0.8
5.4
5.2
Gogebic
 
2.1
0.1
-2.1
-2.2
 
2.2
0.3
-1.4
-1.5
Grand Traverse
 
3.4
0.2
-0.7
-0.8
 
1.6
0.1
-2.0
-2.1
Gratiot
 
1.2
0.0
-2.9
-3.0
 
5.4
0.6
1.8
1.6
Hillsdale
 
8.6
0.4
4.4
4.3
 
1.6
0.3
-2.0
-2.1
Houghton
 
1.5
0.1
-2.6
-2.7
 
9.9
0.6
6.2
6.1
Huron
 
6.1
0.4
1.9
1.9
 
2.3
0.3
-1.3
-1.5
Ingham
 
8.6
0.3
4.5
4.4
 
7.4
0.5
3.8
3.7
Ionia
 
3.3
0.2
-0.8
-0.9
 
3.6
0.6
0.0
-0.1
Iosco
 
6.3
0.4
2.1
2.1
 
10.8
1.1
7.1
7.0
Iron
 
2.5
0.2
-1.6
-1.7
 
8.5
0.5
4.8
4.7
Isabella
 
-5.8
-0.3
-9.9
-10.0
 
6.8
0.5
3.1
3.0
Jackson
 
5.2
0.3
1.0
0.9
 
4.8
0.6
1.2
1.1
Kalamazoo
 
6.2
0.3
2.1
2.0
 
7.9
1.0
4.2
4.1
Kalkaska
 
5.8
0.8
1.6
1.6
 
-2.2
-0.1
-5.8
-6.0
Kent
 
4.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
 
3.2
0.4
-0.4
-0.5
Keweenaw
 
S
S
S
S
 
14.3
0.4
10.7
10.5
Lake
 
5.3
0.4
1.2
1.1
 
S
S
S
S
Lapeer
 
6.9
0.6
2.7
2.6
 
4.5
0.6
0.9
0.7
Leelanau
 
2.7
0.2
-1.5
-1.6
 
8.1
0.4
4.4
4.3
Lenawee
 
4.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
 
2.2
0.3
-1.4
-1.5
Livingston
 
4.2
0.3
0.0
-0.1
 
9.9
1.1
6.3
6.2
Luce
 
S
S
S
S
 
3.8
0.1
0.1
0.0
Mackinac
 
8.3
0.6
4.1
4.1
 
5.8
0.1
2.2
2.1
Macomb
 
5.6
0.3
1.4
1.4
 
2.1
0.3
-1.5
-1.6
Manistee
 
4.9
0.3
0.7
0.6
 
-1.4
-0.1
-5.0
-5.1
Marquette
 
0.1
0.0
-4.1
-4.2
 
10.6
0.4
7.0
6.9
Mason
 
0.3
0.0
-3.8
-3.9
 
5.9
0.9
2.3
2.1
Mecosta
 
-26.4
-1.4
-30.5
-30.6
 
2.0
0.2
-1.6
-1.7
Menominee
 
5.5
0.2
1.3
1.3
 
6.1
1.4
2.5
2.4
Midland
 
2.5
0.2
-1.7
-1.8
 
-4.3
-0.5
-8.0
-8.1
Missaukee
 
2.1
0.2
-2.0
-2.1
 
4.1
0.5
0.5
0.4
Monroe
 
15.4
0.9
11.2
11.2
 
-0.4
0.0
-4.0
-4.2
Montcalm
 
5.9
0.4
1.8
1.7
 
6.0
0.8
2.4
2.3
Montmorency
 
S
S
S
S
 
0.9
0.2
-2.7
-2.8
Muskegon
 
3.7
0.2
-0.5
-0.6
 
8.7
1.4
5.1
4.9
Newaygo
 
4.1
0.3
-0.1
-0.1
 
3.7
0.5
0.1
-0.1
Oakland
 
3.6
0.2
-0.5
-0.6
 
5.6
0.4
2.0
1.9
Oceana
 
2.0
0.1
-2.1
-2.2
 
2.2
0.3
-1.5
-1.6
Ogemaw
 
-1.5
-0.1
-5.6
-5.7
 
28.6
1.2
24.9
24.8
Ontonagon
 
4.7
0.2
0.5
0.4
 
S
S
S
S
Osceola
 
21.9
2.4
17.8
17.7
 
-0.6
-0.1
-4.3
-4.4
Oscoda
 
2.5
0.2
-1.6
-1.7
 
15.2
1.3
11.5
11.4
Otsego
 
5.4
0.4
1.2
1.2
 
-3.3
-0.3
-7.0
-7.1
Ottawa
 
5.6
0.3
1.4
1.3
 
3.0
0.7
-0.7
-0.8
Presque Isle
 
6.6
0.5
2.5
2.4
 
-1.6
-0.1
-5.2
-5.4
Roscommon
 
3.6
0.3
-0.5
-0.6
 
S
S
S
S
Saginaw
 
4.5
0.2
0.4
0.3
 
6.4
0.7
2.7
2.6
St. Clair
 
-11.9
-1.1
-16.1
-16.2
 
6.8
0.8
3.2
3.1
St. Joseph
 
10.0
0.4
5.8
5.7
 
3.3
0.9
-0.4
-0.5
Sanilac
 
10.1
0.6
6.0
5.9
 
1.7
0.3
-2.0
-2.1
Schoolcraft
 
9.3
0.5
5.2
5.1
 
0.9
0.1
-2.7
-2.8
Shiawassee
 
4.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
 
-2.2
-0.2
-5.9
-6.0
Tuscola
 
6.4
0.5
2.2
2.1
 
4.4
0.4
0.8
0.7
Van Buren
 
3.7
0.2
-0.4
-0.5
 
8.4
0.8
4.8
4.6
Washtenaw
 
-1.3
0.0
-5.5
-5.5
 
-4.6
-0.2
-8.3
-8.4
Wayne
 
6.7
0.3
2.6
2.5
 
3.0
0.3
-0.6
-0.7
Wexford
 
2.4
0.1
-1.8
-1.9
 
1.4
0.3
-2.2
-2.3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan
 
4.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
 
3.8
0.4
0.1
0.0
Metropolitan
 
4.7
0.2
0.5
0.4
 
3.8
0.4
0.2
0.1
Nonmetropolitan
 
2.4
0.2
-1.7
-1.8
 
3.4
0.4
-0.2
-0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
4.1
0.2
0.0
 
3.6
0.2
0.0
Metropolitan U.S.
 
4.2
0.2
0.1
 
3.8
0.2
0.2
Nonmetropolitan U.S.
 
3.7
0.2
-0.5
 
3.0
0.3
-0.7
1CC (Component Contribution) - Contibution to the to total growth of all local employment.
2Difference between the national growth rate and the local growth rate.
3Difference between the Michigan growth rate and the local growth rate.
SSuppressed to avoid disclosure of confidential information.
Note: Percent growth figures may not add due to rounding by a factor of ± 0.1%
Source: Calculations by the Michigan Regional Economic Analysis Project (MI-REAP)
with data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_510400_510500_GA
 
   
Select an alternate year:
   
 
Construction vs. Manufacturing
Employment Growth by Region:
Michigan, 2022
 
Construction
 
Manufacturing
Metropolitan Statistical Areas
 
Growth
Rate
CC1
2Local -
National
Growth
3Local -
State
Growth
 
Growth
Rate
CC1
2Local -
National
Growth
3Local -
State
Growth
Ann Arbor
 
-1.3
0.0
-5.5
-5.5
 
-4.6
-0.2
-8.3
-8.4
Battle Creek
 
2.6
0.1
-1.5
-1.6
 
1.8
0.3
-1.9
-2.0
Bay City
 
6.6
0.3
2.5
2.4
 
3.0
0.3
-0.6
-0.7
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn
 
4.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
 
3.9
0.4
0.3
0.2
Flint
 
7.5
0.4
3.3
3.2
 
2.8
0.2
-0.8
-0.9
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
 
4.6
0.2
0.5
0.4
 
3.2
0.5
-0.4
-0.5
Jackson
 
5.2
0.3
1.0
0.9
 
4.8
0.6
1.2
1.1
Kalamazoo-Portage
 
6.2
0.3
2.1
2.0
 
7.9
1.0
4.2
4.1
Lansing-East Lansing
 
6.0
0.3
1.9
1.8
 
7.0
0.5
3.4
3.3
Midland
 
2.5
0.2
-1.7
-1.8
 
-4.3
-0.5
-8.0
-8.1
Monroe
 
15.4
0.9
11.2
11.2
 
-0.4
0.0
-4.0
-4.2
Muskegon-Norton Shores
 
3.7
0.2
-0.5
-0.6
 
8.7
1.4
5.1
4.9
Niles
 
5.4
0.2
1.2
1.1
 
6.9
1.1
3.2
3.1
Saginaw
 
4.5
0.2
0.4
0.3
 
6.4
0.7
2.7
2.6
South Bend-Mishawaka
 
4.1
0.2
0.0
-0.1
 
1.4
0.1
-2.3
-2.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michigan
 
4.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
 
3.8
0.4
0.1
0.0
Metropolitan
 
4.7
0.2
0.5
0.4
 
3.8
0.4
0.2
0.1
Nonmetropolitan
 
2.4
0.2
-1.7
-1.8
 
3.4
0.4
-0.2
-0.4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
 
4.1
0.2
0.0
 
3.6
0.2
0.0
Metropolitan U.S.
 
4.2
0.2
0.1
 
3.8
0.2
0.2
Nonmetropolitan U.S.
 
3.7
0.2
-0.5
 
3.0
0.3
-0.7
1CC (Component Contribution) - Contibution to the to total growth of all local employment.
2Difference between the national growth rate and the local growth rate.
3Difference between the Michigan growth rate and the local growth rate.
Note: Percent growth figures may not add due to rounding by a factor of ± 0.1%
Source: Calculations by the Michigan Regional Economic Analysis Project (MI-REAP)
with data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_510400_510500_GB
 
   
Additional Notes on Interpreting
Employment for Michigan
Employment
The employment estimates compiled by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) measure the number of full- and part-time employees, plus the number of proprietors of unincorporated businesses. People holding more than one job are counted in the employment estimates for each job they hold. This means BEA employment estimates represent a job count, not a number-of-people employed count. Also, BEA employment is by place-of-work, rather than by place-of-residence. Therefore, the jobs held by residents living outside Michigan but who commute to work in Michigan are included in the employment (or job) count for Michigan.
Other/Suppressed Industries
For some areas, an industry category labeled "Other/Suppressed Industries" may appear in the table. It is not uncommon, especially for smaller areas, to encounter suppressed data for selected industries. Data are suppressed to avoid disclosure of confidential information regarding individual firms. Even though the concern for confidentiality may relate to only one industry, data for at least two must be suppressed as summing over the reported data and subtracting from the total yields data for the suppressed category. When suppressed data is encountered, it is reported in the "Other/Suppressed Industries" category.
Location Quotient
Location quotients help gauge the extent to which various industries are more or less concentrated locally when compared with the nation at large. If an industry's share of total employment is the same as the national share, then its location quotient is equal to one. If an industry is concentrated in a region, its local employment share will be larger than the share nationally, and its location quotient will correspondingly be greater than one. Conversely, the location quotient for an industry not concentrated in the region will fall between zero and one.
Component Contribution
The component contribution isolates and records each industry's individual contribution to the total growth of employment in Michigan over 2022, and 2002-2022, respectively. When summed over all industries the component contribution will match Michigan's TOTAL employment growth rate.
Copyright © 2023. Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Analysis Project (PNREAP). All Rights Reserved.

Please stay tuned...
while your request is processing:

Please wait while your request is being processed...
To offer the most comprehensive set of interactive options in support of your research, MI-REAP calculates and crunches most of the data and generates the narrative and graphic analysis on demand in response to your request.
Your request will soon be available.
Just a few more seconds....Your request has been generated and is now loading the results.