Leading, Slipping, Gaining, Lagging Analysis:
Assessing Retail Trade Earnings Growth
Across Michigan Counties
Real* Retail Trade
Earnings Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Real* Retail Trade
Earnings Growth
Michigan:
2010-2022 = 3.85%
2022 = 5.17%
Borrowing from an approach that sometimes appears in the finance sections of the popular press, LSGL analysis is a handy and versatile way to compare, portray and classify the patterns of real retail trade earnings growth across all of Michigan's 83 counties. In finance, this technique is used for comparing and assessing the market performance of individual securities or across industry sectors. For example, the performance of the 30 stocks contained within Dow are compared with one another over the past week in contrast to their performance over the past month using the Dow's respective averages as the points of reference.
Here in this Michigan Regional Economic Analysis Project report, we adopt this approach to gauge and compare the real retail trade earnings growth of Michigan's 83 counties over the latest available year (2022) against the backdrop of their growth over the long term period (2010-2022). In so doing we classify their growth and performance into 4 broad categories: Leading, Slipping, Gaining and Lagging.
Real* Retail Trade
Earnings Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Real* Retail Trade
Earnings Growth
Michigan:
2010-2022 = 3.85%
2022 = 5.17%
This figure displays the 83 counties of Michigan as dots on a scattergram, with the vertical axis representing the average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate over the long-term period (2010-2022), and the horizontal axis representing the real retail trade earnings growth rate for the near-term (2022).
This figure sets apart those counties whose long-term real retail trade earnings growth exceeded the statewide average of 3.85%, by portraying them in the top two quadrants demarcated at 3.85% on the vertical axis. County whose long-term average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate trailed the statewide average (3.85%) are distributed in the bottom two quadrants. In all, 35 counties surpassed the statewide average over 2010-2022, while 46 counties fell below.
Similarly, the two quadrants on the right of this figure present the positions of the 48 counties whose most recent (2022) real retail trade earnings growth rate exceeded the statewide average (5.17%). The two quadrants on the left feature those 33 counties whose real retail trade earnings growth over 2022 trailed the statewide average.
Accordingly, each quadrant portrays the performance of all 83 counties corresponding with their long-term (2010-2022) and near-term (2022) performance relative to their respective statewide averages of 3.85% over 2010-2022 and 5.17% over 2022:
Leading counties () (top-right quadrant)...are counties whose average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate surpassed the statewide average both long-term (3.85%) and near-term (5.17%).
Slipping counties () (top-left quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate exceeded the statewide average (3.85%), but whose near-term growth has "slipped" by falling below the Michigan average (5.17%).
Gaining counties () (bottom-right quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate fell below the statewide average (3.85%), but whose near-term growth has "gained" by registering above the average (5.17%) statewide.
Lagging counties () (bottom-left quadrant)...are counties whose average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate fell under the statewide average both long-term (3.85%) and near-term (5.17%).
   
 
Summary of Michigan's 83 County Totals
 
Short Term Average
 
 
Below
(5.17%)
Above
(5.17%)
 
Long
Term
Average
Above
(3.85%)
10
25
35
Below
(3.85%)
23
23
46
 
33
48
81
 
   
Leading Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Leading Counties
white dot
Michigan:
2010-2022 = 3.85%
2022 = 5.17%
Turning attention to the top-right quadrant from the discussion above, this figure features the distribution of the Michigan counties classified as Leading. These counties surpassed Michigan's average annual real retail trade earnings growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 3.85%) as well as near-term (2022 = 5.17%). Each is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Michigan's 83 counties, 25 (30%) are classified within the Leading () category. Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Slipping Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Slipping Counties
Michigan:
2010-2022 = 3.85%
2022 = 5.17%
This figure depicts the distribution of the 10 Michigan counties classified as Slipping (top-left quadrant), in that their long-term average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate outpaced the average statewide (2010-2022 = 3.85%), while they trailed the statewide average near-term (2022 = 5.17%). Again, each county is identified by it's corresponding ranking based on its average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate over 2010-2022.
Only 10 (12%) of Michigan's 83 counties are classified as Slipping (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Gaining Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Gaining Counties
white dot
Michigan:
2010-2022 = 3.85%
2022 = 5.17%
This figure shows the distribution of the 23 Michigan counties classified as Gaining (bottom-right quadrant), in that their long-term average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate posted below the average statewide (2010-2022 = 3.85%), while they outpaced Michigan's average near-term (2022 = 5.17%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on its average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Michigan's 83 counties, 28% (23) are featured as Gaining (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Lagging Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Lagging Counties
white dot
Michigan:
2010-2022 = 3.85%
2022 = 5.17%
This figure depicts the distributions of the 23 Michigan counties classified as Lagging (bottom-left quadrant). These counties trailed the statewide average annual real retail trade earnings growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 3.85%) as well as near-term (2022 = 5.17%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual real retail trade earnings growth rate over 2010-2022.
28% of Michigan's counties, 23 of 83, are characterized here as Lagging (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
   
 
Michigan
Real* Retail Trade Earnings Growth
County vs. Statewide Average
 
2010-2022
 
2022
 
 
Leading Counties
 
23
4.51
 
49
5.22
12,242
 
8
6.13
 
38
5.79
184,829
 
29
4.13
 
32
6.22
27,686
 
19
4.94
 
30
6.47
27,535
 
30
4.12
 
13
8.05
53,730
 
13
5.16
 
5
12.24
27,849
 
33
3.95
 
11
9.03
39,709
 
27
4.31
 
1
13.63
47,751
 
12
5.22
 
45
5.36
249,658
 
34
3.93
 
46
5.34
147,863
 
22
4.51
 
36
5.84
396,283
 
32
4.00
 
34
6.09
79,453
 
26
4.32
 
37
5.82
669,340
 
21
4.52
 
39
5.67
2,017,815
 
1
9.69
 
2
13.51
1,874
 
6
6.94
 
6
10.03
32,329
 
11
5.25
 
22
6.98
473,102
 
25
4.43
 
4
12.37
10,157
 
17
4.98
 
3
13.49
28,313
 
2
9.57
 
7
9.87
27,196
 
20
4.69
 
16
7.78
4,826,749
 
5
7.53
 
21
7.16
37,660
 
3
9.03
 
43
5.47
37,670
 
18
4.95
 
10
9.03
13,616
 
9
5.76
 
35
6.06
604,750
Slipping Counties
 
10
5.44
 
62
3.90
129,509
 
31
4.05
 
71
3.38
60,842
 
4
8.16
 
80
-0.28
35,648
 
15
5.11
 
66
3.76
22,830
 
24
4.46
 
55
4.49
144,239
 
28
4.28
 
60
4.05
2,178,787
 
14
5.13
 
53
4.72
47,689
 
7
6.45
 
68
3.55
105,726
 
35
3.87
 
61
3.95
500,470
 
16
5.09
 
51
5.02
101,302
Gaining Counties
 
60
2.88
 
25
6.71
232,968
 
52
3.16
 
47
5.30
311,535
 
65
2.68
 
48
5.23
74,257
 
36
3.74
 
20
7.18
49,338
 
37
3.72
 
17
7.69
23,400
 
42
3.57
 
44
5.38
937,553
 
81
-0.64
 
27
6.67
24,172
 
67
2.48
 
18
7.37
28,198
 
69
2.32
 
26
6.70
616,285
 
58
3.00
 
23
6.97
48,975
 
54
3.12
 
41
5.52
141,408
 
71
2.28
 
42
5.47
148,887
 
79
0.87
 
14
7.92
20,653
 
53
3.12
 
29
6.56
227,323
 
77
1.65
 
9
9.27
7,935
 
38
3.69
 
28
6.64
116,776
 
80
0.49
 
12
8.53
14,561
 
61
2.88
 
33
6.18
56,826
 
50
3.19
 
50
5.20
272,801
 
41
3.64
 
19
7.30
115,185
 
78
1.54
 
8
9.43
13,570
 
49
3.20
 
40
5.53
65,210
 
45
3.52
 
15
7.80
82,631
Lagging Counties
 
63
2.80
 
57
4.29
9,002
 
44
3.56
 
83
-3.67
83,477
 
56
3.06
 
56
4.49
266,100
 
75
2.04
 
52
4.98
50,271
 
70
2.31
 
54
4.66
66,040
 
40
3.66
 
82
-2.76
88,228
 
68
2.34
 
79
0.21
76,950
 
66
2.56
 
77
0.69
62,624
 
72
2.12
 
81
-0.88
46,401
 
76
1.71
 
58
4.26
79,474
 
39
3.68
 
70
3.41
324,591
 
74
2.09
 
74
2.57
138,366
 
48
3.29
 
59
4.15
63,342
 
73
2.10
 
72
2.84
151,799
 
47
3.36
 
73
2.80
102,916
 
62
2.85
 
76
2.20
58,096
 
46
3.38
 
78
0.25
11,966
 
43
3.57
 
69
3.53
518,496
 
57
3.00
 
65
3.85
66,403
 
55
3.07
 
63
3.88
115,061
 
51
3.18
 
64
3.86
100,147
 
64
2.78
 
67
3.73
791,243
 
59
2.98
 
75
2.34
3,280,819
Undefined/Suppressed Counties
 
U
U
 
24
6.73
6,996
 
U
U
 
31
6.40
7,851
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.85
 
5.17
23,599,307
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.97
 
3.04
861,699,000
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1600N_610700_LSGL
 
   
Analysis Options Menu
Select Year Interval
to
Select Alternative Industry
Highlight a Region (Optional)
Copyright © 2023. Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Analysis Project (PNREAP). All Rights Reserved.

Please stay tuned...
while your request is processing:

Please wait while your request is being processed...
To offer the most comprehensive set of interactive options in support of your research, MI-REAP calculates and crunches most of the data and generates the narrative and graphic analysis on demand in response to your request.
Your request will soon be available.
Just a few more seconds....Your request has been generated and is now loading the results.